3.1.Interim
PRSP (I-PRSP)
The
interim PRSP is a document showing:
3.2. Decision by the World Bank and IMF
The
IMF and the WB will discuss the interim strategy and when endorsed a country
may be entitled for some debt relief measures from bilateral and multilateral
lenders. The country may also be qualified for some program and policy
implementation support.
3.3. The PRSP stages
Active
participation is possible if stakeholders are informed about what to do
and when in the PRSP process. In this regard it would be very useful to
understand the PRSP process itself. The table below describes the detailed
stages in designing the PRSP and the required participation from various
stakeholders.
|
Process |
|
|
Problem
and potential Analysis
|
Problems
are analyzed through different platforms and presented to a multi-disciplinary
multi stakeholder conference. Quantitative and qualitative research to
deepen knowledge about the poverty situation is supported and encouraged.The
problem and constraints causing poverty are debated and major problems
are ranked.
Civil
society institutions are expected to assist the public to identify natural,
human, financial, institutional and material potentials in order to put
them into use for problem solving.
|
|
Objective
analysis
|
The
public sets the objective of the strategy or program with detailed monitoring
indicators. In this phase development principles, international commitments,
human rights conventions (example every person shall eat) are in detail
examined in order to serve as benchmark indicators. Mostly politician sets
internationally accepted pro poor objectives.
|
|
Alternative
analysis
|
Alternative
analysis is a critical stage in the planning process. Unfortunately it
is usually bypassed. The planning team or any interested stakeholder should
present alternative action paths to achieve commonly stated objectives.Here
is also where the major differences in approach could be observed. Mostly
governments provide one option to their citizen. That option is their option.
Participation requires that the options of various stakeholders need to
be discussed, debated and consensus be established. Consensus could be
easily established if stakeholders agree primarily to establish alternative
selection criteria. Goal oriented alternative analysis approach is easily
understood by all stakeholders and hence is recommended for application
in this phase.
|
|
Program
formulation
|
Based
on the selected strategy and development path in the alternative analysis
phase, a detailed description of major programs, investment profiles, the
country’s financial capability and external support requirements will be
defined.Long-term implementation
modalities will be worked out.Stakeholders
should get the opportunity to discuss the program content in detail. Program
elements that the public supports should be emphasized.Once
a broad consensus is established on the policy objective, strategy and
program elements, the PRSP will be approved by public authorities before
submission to the international community.
|
|
Approval
stage
|
The
approval stage constitutes two separate stages:
first
the government of Ethiopia will approve the PRSP;
the
second involves decisions by the boards of the WB and IMF for loans and
additional debt relief measures. |
|
Implementation
design
|
After
the international community agrees to fund some or all of the strategic
program components, then implementation design will be formulated. This
is the stage where the details of when program and programs are implemented,
by whom, how, by how much money, where etc are answered. This stage is
more important to get impact. In many cases impact is low as a result of
poorly designed and managed implementation phase. Different stakeholders
should share and negotiate roles. Partnership should be planned. The civil
society and the private sector should carefully watch these stages. If
there is any corruption this phase, the implementation procedures should
clearly spell out issues of transparency, accountability and monitoring
and evaluation frameworks.
|
|
Monitoring
strategy
|
Stakeholders
will share responsibility. Questions such as who shall perform the task?
For whom and at what time interval shall it report? etc. are specified.
If this stage is passed, issues of transparency and accountability will
be lacking. In a centralized system, which lack adequate monitoring and
evaluation strategy involving national, regional and local interest groups,
funds could easily be appropriated with false reports.
|
|
Implementation
and Implementation monitoring.
|
This
is the stage where the various components of the program are implemented.
Major purchases and employment of staff is made. Beneficiaries are identified.
Monitoring and evaluation will be the major task of civil societies at
all levels of government. It could good if civil societies establish permanent
forum for monitoring and evaluation and regularly monitor the development
process based on the commonly agreed monitoring and evaluation framework.
Closed
and secret meetings are among the sources of corruption. Because of this
the public should demand that all meetings of elected offices should be
recorded and made public as required. In this stage the role of the media
is critical. The media should constantly advocate for the right for information.
Corruption could only be reduced with meaningful participation of the public
in monitoring and evaluation and the media can lead the struggle.
|
|
Out
come and impact monitoring
|
Impacts
of the strategy should be studied and communicated to the public. Civil
society shall participate in impact and outcome monitoring. Especially
research and academic institutions are expected to conduct scientific evaluations.
|
|
Sr.
No.
|
|
Major
outputs of the strategy
|
|
1
|
Agricultural
led industrialization
|
Expand
the extension service coverage, promote irrigation agriculture, facilitate
commercial agriculture through leasing government owned land, encourage
small holders to orient production aimed at profit, construct rural roads,
support production of hand tools, promote agricultural export, continued
reliance on food aid from abroad, expand credit services through rural
saving and credit institutions.
Promote
growth in industry through investment in utilities and manufacturing and
three other measures. This includes increasing the efficiency of existing
policies, creating a joint platform and making business trends environment
and incentives attractive. Promotion of export is emphasized.
|
|
2
|
Judiciary
and civil service reform
|
Implement
the expenditure and management component of the reform, change the employees
incentive and evaluation system, improve service quality and complaint
handling procedures in public offices, improve the selection and management
of senior management, introduce code of conduct and prevent corruption,
and overhaul the legislative framework to reflect the constitution.
|
|
3
|
Decentralization
and empowerment
|
Decentralization
of power further to the woreda including financial powers, implementing
activities that ensure women’s equality.
|
|
4
|
Capacity
Building
|
Human
resource development, institutional development, systems development in
provision of services(put in place result oriented system), farmers training,
training of woreda and zone executives, etc.
|
|
5
|
Sector
programs
|
The
I-PRSP includes detailed description ofexisting
programs on agricultural extension, the ESRDF program packages, health
and educationand the road sector
initiative.
|
|
Sr.
No.
|
Major
welfare objective
|
Indicator
|
Present
condition 2001
|
Target
for 2003
|
|
1
|
Reduce
poverty and inequality
|
|
45.5
137 |
40.0
150 |
|
2
|
Improve
food security
|
|
42.2 15.8 10.3 50 |
60 17 12.7 40 |
|
3
|
Health
conditions improved
|
|
52
5.2 60 |
55
7 70 |
|
4
|
Improve
education coverage
|
|
45.8
12.5 |
50
14.5 |
|
5
|
Potable
water supply improved
|
|
30 - |
36 - |
|
6
|
Access
to road facility
|
|
6
|
5
|
Contribute
to towards the effectiveness of poverty reduction interventions.
Purpose:
Assist
(the government of Ethiopia) in developing country owned, participatory
and inclusive PRSP and thereafter ensure peoples participation at all levels.
Program
period
The
program is planned for a period of three years.
|
|
The
first year of the program
|
Planned
activities of the EEA /EEPRI’s over the three year period |
|
Diagnostic
stage
|
Awareness
creation about PRSP
|
|
|
Press
briefing on Radio and Television
|
||
|
Arrange
public Discussion in all regions
|
||
|
Prepare
issue papers on selected topics
|
||
|
Make
Discussions and public debate based on issue papers
|
||
|
Under
take different training programs
|
||
|
Communicate
the discussions with responsible government organ and Banks
|
||
|
Agree
with the government for a permanent forum of discussion on the issue and
share available information
|
||
|
Organize
experience sharing workshop
|
||
|
Program
Formulation stage |
|
|
|
Under
take different workshops and focused discussions
|
||
|
Organize
stakeholders taskforce to comment on the strategy
|
||
|
Dialogue
and achievingconsensus among
stakeholders about the content of the strategy
|
||
|
Media
briefing and awareness for the public about the proposed strategy and needed
improvements
|
||
|
Arrange
special session for parliament to indicate the strength and weakness of
the strategy
|
||
|
Approval
|
Build
general consensus about the strategy
|
|
|
Brief
the Donor community about the participatory procedure of the PRSP
|
||
|
Disseminate
information for the public
|
||
|
Seek
public and donor support for the strategy
|
||
|
Implementation
design, Implementation and Monitoring and Evaluation |
Program
activities after the PRSP is approved
|
Regularly
update the public about the budget and its implementation
|
|
Make
research on service delivery system
|
||
|
Make
dialogues among stakeholders on service delivery
|
||
|
Make
regular surveys aimed at monitoring of impact
|
||
|
Disseminate
the results to the public
|
||
|
Translate
duplicate and disseminate the PRSP document
|
||
|
Organize
round table discussions on the implementation of the PRSP
|
||
|
Work
at improving the monitoring and evaluation capacities of stakeholders through
regular training
|
||
|
Regularly
report on the performance of the economy
|
||
|
Provide
feedback to the decision makers to revise strategy
|
||
|
Organize
workshops and public meetings on progress made in the PRSP implementation
|
||
|
Broadcast
PRSP implementation assessment in the media
|
||
|
Impact
assessment
|
Make
impact assessment studies
|
|
|
Define
the role of stakeholders in evaluation
|
||
|
Undertake
participatory evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Labor
unions
|
25/8/01
|
Labor
policy, employment and poverty
|
Employers
and labor associations, association of the unemployed, Government
|
|
|
2
|
Parliamentarians
and elected persons at all level
|
06/12/01
|
Poverty
reduction and the role of the legislature in the framework of good governance
and decentralization.
|
Parliamentarians
and elected officials at all levels
|
|
|
3
|
The
private sector
|
12/12/01
|
Constraints
of the private sector development
|
Chamber
of commerce, people in the private sector, government and financial institutions
|
|
|
4
|
NGO
and Civil Society
|
20/12/01
|
|