Prospects and Challenges of Water Supply and Sanitation in Ethiopia with respect to MDGs

 

By: Teshome Adugna (PhD student)

Innsbruck University

Auteria

 

Abstract

 

Water supply and sanitation are two most important sectors in development. The objectives of this study are to describe the water supply and sanitation coverage, to identify the source of water supply and types of sanitation, to study the regional, urban and rural distribution of water supply and sanitation facilities in the country. In addition to these, the study analyse the expected improvement of water supply and sanitation coverage with its required cost to meet the Millennium Development Goals of water supply and sanitation in Ethiopia. The study use descriptive analysis to address its objectives.

 

The study reveals that water supply and sanitation coverage in Ethiopia is one of the lowest in the world, which is 39.4 percent and 11.5 percent in 2004 respectively. 63.9 percent of water supply came from unprotected source of water as compared to 35.9 percent water supply source that came from protected well/spring, public and private tap. In the same way unprotected sanitation takes around 69 percent of sanitation facility. Only 31 percent of the people use protected sanitation that are flush and pit latrine toilet in the same year. The Millennium Development Goals expected to provide water supply and sanitation for 36 million and 45 million people at the end of the development goals respectively.

 

Sustainability of water supply and sanitation scheme, lack of financial and skilled person, poor cost recovery, poor absorptive capacity, absence of clearly stated responsibilities between region, woreda and community water committee are the major problems that will encounter the implementation of this program. The Federal or regional government should conduct awareness campaign to local people, provide suitable vocational and technical training, improve absorptive capacity of aid or loan that available for water supply and sanitation projects in order to meet the stated targets.

 


1 Introduction

 

Ethiopia is among the poorest countries in the world, ranking 170 out of 177 in the UN Human Development Index (HDI) in 2005.The country also the second most populated countries in Africa with 78 million people in 2006. Higher level of poverty prevalence, poor access for education, health, water supply and sanitation are the characteristics of the countries in the last many decades.  One  sixth of all African who need access to water live in Ethiopia( Eth. UN team,2004).The higher  incidence of water and excreta –related disease in the country result from unsatisfactory water supplies and poor waste disposal system. Diarrhoeal disease takes the life of 1.8 million people each year, most of them children under five (UNICEF, 2004). In addition to this a number of children unable to attained school and women also in forced to travel a long distance to collect water from river and lakes or other sources. Access to water supply and sanitation reduce these challenges in the country.

 

In realizing the need to address these challenges in the country within a time bound and targeted frameworks, Government of Ethiopia (GoE) accepted and localized the Millennium Development Gaols (MDGs) with its PASDEP[1]. Goal seven of the millennium declaration is to ensure environmental sustainable. Target ten of this goal is to halve the shortage of water supply and sanitation at the end of the millennium development goals (2015).This paper has eleven sections. The second section describes the objectives of the study. The third section discusses the historical development of millennium development goals. In this section you will see the different views that have been forwarded by world leaders to solve the problems of developing courtiers at UN general assembly since 1960s.

 

The fourth section explains the direct and indirect role of water supply and sanitation to meet all goals of the millennium declaration. In the fifth section you will see the water supply and sanitation situation in Ethiopia. In this part we will see the water supply and sanitation coverage as compared to with selected countries. The next section explains the trends of water supply and sanitation in Ethiopia. Section seven studies source of water supply and types of sanitation facilities in the country. Section eight highlight the water supply and sanitation policy in Ethiopia. Section nine analyses the MDGs water supply and sanitation targets and the required level of financial cost to achieve the millennium development goals in the countries. The next section identifies the challenges of water supply and sanitation provision to meet the MDGs. The last section is conclusion and recommendations.

 

The study used the secondary date that collected from difference sources: Ministry of Water Resource of Ethiopia, World Health Organization, World Bank and other publication of government and non governmental office. The method of analysis is simple description like percentage, ratio, tabulation and graph.

 

2. Objective of the study

The general objective of the study is to see the prospects and challenges of water supply and sanitation to meet the Millennium Development Goals of halving the problem of water supply and sanitation in Ethiopia. The specific objectives are:

 

Ø      To review the historical development of Millennium Development Goals.

Ø      To study the water supply and sanitation coverage of the country by comparing with selected countries.

Ø      To see the major sources of drinking water supply and types of sanitation facilities available in Ethiopia.

Ø      To analyse the Millennium Development Goals water supply and sanitation targets

Ø      To study the infrastructures and financial requirement to meet the water supply and sanitation up to the end of 2015.

Ø      To identify the challenges that will be facing to meet the WSS Millennium Development Goals.

Ø      To forward the possible recommendation to meet MDGs WSS target.

 

3. Background to the development of the MDGs

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are the end product of numerous UN development conferences from the 1960s to 1990s.   These all UN development decades (First, Second, Third and Fourth Development decades) focused largely on economic growth. The first UN Development Decade was launched by the General Assembly in December 1961. It called on all member states to intensify their efforts to mobilize support for measures required to accelerate progress toward self-sustaining economic growth and social advancement in the developing countries. With each developing country setting its own target, the objective would be a minimum annual growth rate of 5% in aggregate national income by the end of the decade.

In 1970, the General Assembly adopted a resolution outlining an international development strategy for the second UN Development Decade. The main objectives of the plan were to promote sustained economic growth, particularly in the developing countries; ensure a higher standard of living, and facilitate the process of narrowing the gap between the developed and developing countries. The General Assembly declared that the developing countries bore primary responsibility for their development but that their efforts would be insufficient without increased financial assistance and more favorable economic and commercial policies on the part of the developed countries. Under the goals and objectives of the second decade, the General Assembly stated that the average annual rate of growth in the gross product of the developing countries as a whole should be at least 6%, with the possibility of attaining a higher rate in the second half of the decade. Such a rate of growth would imply an average annual expansion of 4% in agricultural output and 8% in manufacturing output.

The third UN development decade which begin on 1, January 1981, focused on New International Economic Order (NIEO), which introduced by developing countries. The new international development strategy was adopted by the General Assembly for the third UN Development Decade. It agreed to the goals and objectives of the strategy and to translate them into reality by adopting a coherent set of interrelated, concrete and effective policy measures in all sectors of development

The strategy set forth goals and objectives for an accelerated development of the developing countries in the period 1981–90, including the following: (1) a 7% average annual rate of growth of gross domestic product (GDP); (2) a 7.5% annual rate of expansion of exports and an 8% annual rate of expansion of imports of goods and services; (3) an increase in gross domestic savings to reach about 24% of GDP by 1990; (4) a rapid and substantial increase in official development assistance by all developed countries, to reach or surpass the target of 0.7% of GNP of developed countries; (5) a 4% average annual rate of expansion of agricultural production; and (6) a 9% annual rate of expansion of manufacturing output. Other goals and objectives of the strategy included the attainment, by the year 2000, of full employment, of universal primary school enrollment, and of life expectancy of 60 years as a minimum, with infant mortality rates no higher than 50 per 1,000 live births.

In 1990, the General Assembly concluded that its goals for the Third UN Development Decade had not been attained. It set new priorities and goals for the growth of the developing member nations with its International Development Strategy (IDS) for the Fourth United Nations Development Decade (1991–2000). Within one year of its passage, however, the former USSR had dissolved, forever changing the landscape of international economic relations. Many of the assumptions on which the IDS had been based were upset by the historic forces that were thus set in motion.

In September 1990, the Second United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries set targets for official development assistance (ODA) to those nations. The General Assembly, through the new IDS, urged industrialized countries to reach or surpass those targets. It also recommended that developing countries try to raise their rate of industrialization by 8–10% and increase their annual food production by 4%. The implementation of the commitment of IDS was not successful according to the study committee report conducted in October 1999.

For future purposes, the report went on to differentiate between growth, which may carry with it negative social consequences, and development, which means more than simply increased purchasing power (as reflected in gross domestic product per capita). According to the report, development also pertains to education, health, and environmental standards, as well as to social (including gender) equity. For this reason, "the spotlight is now shifting from a focus on macroeconomic challenges to a number of institutional preconditions, including good governance, transparency and accountability, decentralization and participation and social security," said the UN report. Acceptable and viable development strategies in the new millennium would have to take into account the prevailing circumstances in developing countries, which could not be expected to keep pace with industrialized, developed societies in the North.

As a result, the MDGs reflect the emerging role of human rights in the international community, focusing on the economic, social and cultural rights enumerated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (rights to food, education, health care, and decent standard of living).  The Goals also reflect a mixture of economic theory and human rights since a variety of human rights advocacy groups and civil society organizations participated in the drafting of the Goals.

The International Development Goals, drafted in 1996 by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), also strongly influenced the MDGs.  Seven of the eight MDGs are exactly the same as the OECD goals.  Like the OECD goals, the first seven MDGs are time-bound and measurable.  The eighth MDG is not time-bound, but instead more of an aspirational goal.  The UN also simulated the manner in which to OECD goals relied on bilateral donors to further their development goals.  Unlike the OECD goals, however, the MDGs were formally adopted by developed and developing countries alike. 

In September 2000 the United Nations General Assembly, representing 189 countries, unanimously adopted the Millennium Declaration.  As per the United Nations General Assembly’s request, the Secretary General and various UN agencies, as well as representatives of the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), devised a plan for achieving the Millennium Declaration’s objectives – resulting in 8 goals, 18 targets and 48 indicators known as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).  Eighteen specific goals targets have been set across the eight goals and forty five indicators to monitor these targets.

The MDGs are a set of time-bound and measurable goals and targets designed to decrease poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, environmental devastation and discrimination against women.  The MDGs are a unique approach to these worldly problems – they confer obligations on both rich and poor governments, but place a heavier burden on rich countries in terms of financial and materials provision. The compressive nature of MDGs, targets and indicators also pose several problems as well as opportunity for the countries that embraced them. The following table show the eight goals and eighteen targets of millennium development goals.( You can see the indicators of all the goals are available at the end of the paper)

Table 1: Millinnum Development Goals with their respective targets

MDGs Goals

MDGs  Targets

Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Hunger and Poverty

1. Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than $1 a day

2. Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger

Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education

3. Ensure that, by 2015, children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling

Goal 3: Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women

4. Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and in all levels of education no later than 2015

Goal 4: Reduce Chiled Mortality

5. Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate

Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health

6. Reduce by three-quarters, between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality ratio

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases

7. Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS
8.  Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major diseases

Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability

9. Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programs and reverse the loss of environmental resources
10. Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation

11. Have achieved by 2020 a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development

12. Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, nondiscriminatory trading and financial system (includes a commitment to good governance, development, and poverty reduction? both nationally and internationally)

13. Address the special needs of the Least Developed Countries (includes tariff- and quota-free access for Least Developed Countries? exports, enhanced program of debt relief for heavily indebted poor countries [HIPCs] and cancellation of official bilateral debt, and more generous official development assistance for countries committed to poverty reduction)

14. Address the special needs of landlocked developing countries and small island developing states (through the Program of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States and 22nd General Assembly provisions)

15.  Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries through national and international measures in order to make debt sustainable in the long term


 

4. Role of water supply and sanitation to meet MDGs

 

Until recently, the multiple benefits or roles of domestic water supply and sanitation not received as much attention as they deserved. It was usually considered water supply and sanitation as largely a “public health” benefit. Now a broad range of non-health benefits have started to be recognized and targeted in an increasing number of studies and report. In the recent draft white paper on water service in South Africa, economic activities are explicitly recognized. “Municipalities do not and should not only provide water service necessary for basic health and hygiene. It is important that municipalities’ undertake health education, facilitate the provision of higher level of service for domestic used and provide service which supports the economic development and well being of communities”(Draft white paper, 2003).

 

 These broad benefit of water supply and sanitation also revealed in the study by WaterAid, a leading NGO working in household water provision(WaterAid,2001).This study reported on an impact associated of older water supply and sanitation project in India, Ethiopia, Ghana and Tanzania. The results showed a wider range of positive impacts that were not in the design of the water project.

 

These indicate meeting the water supply and sanitation target set by the international community for 2015 is a fundamental for achieving the other Millennium Development Goals, such as alleviating poverty ,hunger and malnutrition; reducing child mortality; increase gender equality; providing more opportunity for education and ensuring environmental sustainability. The MDGs and associated targets are an opportunities for prioritizing water on the basic of its ability to impact overall poverty and contribute to significant socioeconomic and environmental gains (IRINA, 2006). Water supply and sanitation can contribute, directly or indirectly, to meeting all the other MDGs (John Soussan, 2003). Despite the strong link between each MDG, in order to understand clearly, let us see briefly the role of water supply and sanitation against each goal of Millennium Development Declarations.

The first goal of millennium declaration is to reduce poverty (to halve the proportion of the world’s people whose income is less than $1 a day) and hunger (to reduce the proportion of the world’s people who suffer from hunger) in 2015.Hear water and sanitation is an important ingredient to achieve these goals at the end of stated year. Provision of water near to the household village or house saves time and effort to use it for other wage earning and other social activities by households. Based on the study conducted by WaterAid (Ibid) time spent in collecting water reduced from an average of six to eight hours to five to twenty minutes in Ethiopia. These affect the household activity; specially women and children participation in the household. Indirectly, therefore water provision increases opportunities for improving household income and nutritional level through assisting in the diversification of livelihood activities.

Water related poverty occurs because people are either denied dependable water resource or because they lack the capacity to use them. We usually invest not for water sack rather for poverty’s sake. Accessibility of water supply and sanitation provide extra time for the household for wage earning activity. Every dollar spent on water supply and sanitation and water resource management is an investment with strong, potential for solid return. The return in multiple sectors could range from USD 3 to USD 34 for every dollar invested to meet the Millennium Development Goals water and sanitation targets (WHO, 2006).At the world Water Week Symposium in Stockholm in 2002, Klaus Topfer, who until 2006 was the longstanding chief of UN Environment program (UNEP), said “without adequate clean water, there can be no escape from poverty,” (Irina, 2006)

 

Box 1: Impact of water  supply on household

I have seen a very radical change here. Before we only had unprotected source of water. My family suffered badly. My three year old daughter died from this water. There were parasites which gave us illnesses and stomach problems. So many children used to die, but now this has changed and children do not die from these diseases.

 

Before we used to have to go to the health clinics all of the time, often every day. I used to spend time walking there and hours just queuing to be seen, but now I can save my time and money. I have bought 20 chickens and one goat from the money I have saved. With the time I can work on my maize and pepper crop can work on my maize and pepper crop

                   

Source: WaterAid,2006

The second goal of the millennium declaration is to achieve universal primary education. The provision of water supply and sanitation increase school attendance by children (especially girls) resulting from enough time to go school. Reduced water carrying burdens improves school attendance, especially for girls and raises education levels. Separate sanitation facilities for girls in school increase their school participation. School children are especially prone to worm infection; improving sanitation and hygiene can prevent these infections and contribute to improved school attendance and better concentration.

 In Tanzania, 12% more children were found to attend school when safe water available within 15 minutes rather than one hour from their home. (Ibid, P.56).Staggering 270 million school attendance days could be gained if the MDGs target are met. Therefore the provision of water and sanitation near to home or school enable us to achieve the universal primary education of millennium declaration.

The third millennium declaration is to promote gender equality and empowers women. Today million of people, mainly women struggle to locate and transport water for drinking, cooking and washing need of their families. Access to water near home will save time for women and girls. This saved time can be spent on productive activities and education, which lay the groundwork for economic growth. Women are particularly concerned about the safety and cleanliness of sanitation facility. For them, sanitation means more than just latrines; they want safe private places with sufficient water for personal use and washing cloth and better drainage to avoid dirty water remaining in the streets.

Especially when water supply improvements are coupled with opportunity to create income trough microenterpise, time released from water collection is converted into income earned. This brings several benefits; reduce drudgery, higher household income and consequently greater women’s empowerment through changing gender relations within the household. An improvement of water supply to the extent that women spend one hour per day on collecting water would result in an improvement of the annual income with upper boundaries of between Rs 750 and Rs 5520.Alternatively, each women might gain between 45 and 152 eight hour days annually for domestic, social and development activities (Van WIJK, 2001)

The forth goal of millennium declaration is to reduce child mortality. Children are particularly at risk from water-related diseases such as diarrhea and parasitic diseases. Lack of sanitation also increases the risk of outbreaks of cholera, typhoid and dysentery. The provision of water and sanitation highly contribute for the reduction of child mortality in most developing countries. It is estimated that unsafe water and a lack of basic sanitation and hygiene every year claim the live of more than 1.5 million children under five years old from diarrhea. But those who die are by no means the only children affected many million more have their development disrupted and their health undermined by diarrhea or other water related disease.

An evaluation seminar held in 1992 as a follow-up to the first UN international Decade for clean drinking water (1981-1990) found that half the incidents of infant and child mortality in central Africa Republic were due to water related diseases (IRINA,2006). WHO estimates that in 2005, 1.6 million children under age 5 (an average of 4500 every day) died from the consequences of unsafe water and inadequate hygiene. In order to reduce the mortality rate of the child we have to provide clean water with adequate sanitation facility. It protects the children from water related disease and enables them to get enough nutrition.

The fifth millennium declaration is to improve maternal health. Just a few decade ago in most developing countries and even now in some vast proportion of people have suffered and are suffering from all sort of disease due to lack of access to safe drinking water and use of unsafe water. Adequate and safe drinking water and sanitation for all is an effective way of protecting the expansion of water born diseases such as diarrhea, cholera, dysentery, etc, which are potential cause of loss of life. The provision of water highly benefits women or mother who travel long distance and spend their time to get water and sanitation. Because they are the one who has more direct contact as compare to men. In order to improve the health status of mother we have to achieve water supply and sanitation target of Millennium Development Goals.

The sixth millennium declaration is similar with the previous two declarations. It is to combat HIV/AIDs, Malaria and other disease in 2015. HIV/AIDS has become the most global epidemic ever. Improved water and sanitation services can play a crucial role in slowing the progression of   HIV and in reducing the number of AIDS related death. Safe drinking is necessary for taking medicines, while nearly latrines make life more tolerable for weak patients (Eleien Kammina and Madeleen Wagelin, 2005). Even good water supply and sanitation are even more important to HIV/AIDS families. They help infected people to stay healthy longer and provide longer for their families. In the same way better management of water resources control the transmission of malaria and other diseases.

The other declaration of millennium summit is to ensure environmental sustainability. The sustainable economic development can be achieved if we used our recourse properly and efficiently. Today current development should not be realized by the cost of future development. Water is one of the unique resources that has strong link with all other resource. Good management of water resources is vita to environmental safety and sustainability. The miss utilization of water highly affects the environment as well as the national economic development. Degradation of freshwater ecosystem and land exacerbate the frequency and impact of droughts, floods and other natural hazards particularly in ecologically fragile area where the poor often live and can intensify competition and the potential for conflict over access the shared water resources.

5. Water supply and sanitation coverage in Ethiopia: Comparative analysis

 

The provision of water supply[2] and sanitation is an important sector that improves the well being of the people. Access to water supply refers to the provision of sustainable water supply to the basic need of the people. Usually it is measured in terms of percentage of people who are access for the minimum requirement of water quantity and quality. Improved drinking water technologies are those more likely to provide safe drinking water than those characterized as unimproved. The minimum requirement can vary from country to country. According to the definition of minimum requirement by the World Bank is each people should get 40 lcpd. But in Ethiopia case 20 lcpd is the minimum requirement per day per person. (CSA, 2004)

 

Sanitation refers to the safe disposal of domestic wastes including human waste. Unsanitation disposal of human waste will result in contamination of water supply sources and spread of water born diseases. Access to sanitation also estimated by the percentage of the population using improved sanitation facilities. Improved sanitation facilities are those more likely to ensure privacy and hygienic use.

 

In 2004 the water supply coverage at national level was 39.4 percent in Ethiopia which is much more less than average world, SSA, Uganda and Kenya. In the same year water coverage in world was 83 percent which is 52.2 percent higher than Ethiopia water coverage. In SSA (Sub Saharan African) countries, the average water supply coverage is 56 percent. It is also higher by 39.4 percent as compared to Ethiopia water supply coverage. Neighbors’ countries like Kenya and Uganda has 62 and 60 percent water supply coverage respectively in 2004. In both countries the coverage are more than average SSA water supply unlike Ethiopia water supply coverage. These indicate that Water supply coverage in Ethiopia is the lowest even as compared to SSA countries and with its neighbors’ countries.

 

Sanitation coverage at world level is 59 percent in 2004.In SSA country the average sanitation coverage is 37 percent. When we come to Ethiopia case, the sanitation coverage is 11.5 percent which is again the lowest as compared to SSA and other neighbors’ country like Uganda (60%) and Kenya (48%). The problem of water supply and sanitation become more sever in Ethiopia when we compare the water supply and sanitation coverage in terms of urban and rural area. At World level, water supply and sanitation in rural area was 73 percent and 39 percent in 2004. In the same years, in urban area, they were 95 percent and 80 percent respectively. In SSA countries also water supply in urban are was 80 percent as compared to 42 percent in rural area. In the same way sanitation coverage was 53 percent as compared to 28 percent in rural area. In Ethiopia also in 2004, 83 percent of the urban people were access to water supply as compared to 31.4 percent in the rural area.

 

Table 2:  Water supply and sanitation coverage in selected countries, 2004

 

Country

Water supply coverage

Sanitation coverage

National

Urban

Rural

Urban rural Gap

National

Urban

Rural

Urban rural Gap

Kenya

62

89

46

43

48

56

43

13

Uganda

60

84

56

28

60

71

58

13

Ethiopia

39.4

83.1

31.4

38

11.5

49.7

3.9

45.8

SSA

56

80

42

40

37

53

28

25

S.E Asia

82

89

77

12

67

81

56

25

Latin A

91

96

73

23

77

86

49

37

World

83

95

73

22

59

80

39

41

Source: JMP[3], 2006 and AFRIC MDR- Report 2006

 

In terms of sanitation, the rural area also only 3.9 percent people got sanitation as compared to 47.7 percent. Sanitation facilities coverage of Ethiopia is one of the lower in the world.  Hear we can see common characteristics at world, SSA and Ethiopia, in terms of urban rural disparity in both water supply and sanitation. But what make us surprising in Ethiopia case is the magnitudes of urban rural inequality is vary high as compared to other countries. As you can see in table 2 above, Ethiopia urban and rural water supply gap is 51.7 percent which is the highest as compared to World (22%), SSA (40%), Uganda (28%) and Kenya (43%). Sanitation coverage also shows the high inequality between urban and rural. In Ethiopia the gap is 45.8, which is the highest as compared to world (41 percent), SSA (25%) and Kenya (13 %).The lower gap in Africa does not indicate that the rural area is more privileged as compared to the other part of the world.

 

This happen because we compared the relatively lowest coverage of urban area with the same lowest level of rural area. To come to my point in addition to lower water supply and sanitation in Ethiopia, the urban and rural inequality in terms of access for water and sanitation is vary high in the country as compared to the rest of world countries.

 

When we observe in terms of number of people access for water, around 20 million and 16 million people are access for pure water in Uganda and Kenya respectively in 2004.In the same year, the number of people who access to water supply is 29 million. It is much more than Kenya and Uganda. When we came in to those people who are not able to get water supply, in Ethiopia around 45 million people are not access to water supply. But in Kenya and Uganda the number of people who do not access for water supply is only 11 million and 12 million respectively. As you can see in the Figure 1 below, the number of people who do not get water supply in Ethiopia is 95 percent higher than the sum of number of people who do not get water in both Kenya and Uganda.

 

 

 

 WSS: water supply served                         SS: Sanitation served

  WSU: water supply unserved                    SU: Sanitation unserved

 

In terms of sanitation also around 66 million people not access for sanitation facility as compared to Kenya (17 million) and Uganda (11 million).Hear the total number of people who do not have access for sanitation in Ethiopia more or less equal   to the total number of people in Kenya and Uganda. This implies that Ethiopia problem of water supply and sanitation is much more than any other developing countries. In addition to this, as you can see in the figure above, the number of people with access to safe water supply is exceeded the number of those with sanitation facilities. While safe water coverage is catching up with population increase, sanitation coverage is slipping (see also section below). This is partly because community expresses a higher demand for water and there are more skilled people and option available for providing water as compared to sanitation.  

 

 

 

 

 

6. Trends of water supply and sanitation coverage

 

Looking at the trends of water supply and sanitation coverage will helps us to understand the performance of water supply and sanitation coverage during the last decades. Hear we will see the change of the water supply and sanitation coverage during 1990 to 2004.This trends can be seen the change of water supply and sanitation coverage over the years and also in terms of the number of peoples served and unnerved for both water supply and sanitation. In 1990 the water supply coverage was 19 percent at the national level. After five years the national water coverage increased to 23 percent. It increased only by 21 percent between 1990-1995.In 2000 the water supply coverage reached 30.8 percent (34 percent increase).The performance is 13 percent higher than the earlier five years. In 2004, the water supply coverage reached to 39.4. In this year, the water supply increased by 28 percent. It is lower than the performance of water supply coverage before five years.

 

In 1990 the level of sanitation is 3 percent that mean 97 percent of the people could not get the sanitation facility. After five years the sanitation coverage increased from 3 percent in 1990 to 5 percent in 1995.In 2000 the sanitation converge reached to 8 percent. It increased by 60 percent as compared to the year 2000.In 2004 the coverage reach it 11.5 percent. In these five years also there is no significant change of the sanitation coverage. In the last 14 years the average increase of water sanitation is only by 2 percent. The gap between sanitation and water supply are very high. The coverage of sanitation is much more less than the coverage of sanitation. The reason is the absence of effective policy and regulation. In addition to this, the other reasons is the absence of coordination between the government, private and beneficiaries sectors in providing water supply and sanitation facilities.